Editor's Notebook: Saying 'no' can be toughest part of job

Reporter's Notebook

Discussion

COMMENTING ON STORIES:

Welcome to our story comments feature. We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including the unpopular ones. We only ask that you keep your conversations clean, civil and on the topic of the story you are commenting on.

Coinciding with our websites redesign, we launched our new story comments feature through Disqus.

Disqus gives users the ability to log into our story comments feature so that they may be able to track their conversations, receive emails when their comments get a reply or to even have your comments update onto your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

For the time being, our story comments feature will continue to have the ability to post comments anonymously. We reserve the right to require registration in the future using your name and verified email address.

Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified at the newspaper’s discretion for a number of different reasons. Please follow our Online Rules of Conduct at all times.

RULES OF CONDUCT:

We reserve the right to remove comments that are unacceptable, to wit:

1. False and inacurate statements.
2. Personal attacks. Explicit name-calling.
3. Harassing, harmful, vulgar, obscene and defamatory language.
4. Threatening statements or statements that suggest violence.
5. Hate speech of any kind.
6. Intolerant comments on religion, race, age, gender, sexual preference or disabilities.
7. Accusations of criminal activity.
8. Content that is harmful to children and minors in any way.
9. References to any type of sexual activity and other private matters.
10. Random and inflammatory statements that are off topic.
11. Advertising of any kind.
12. Typing in all caps.

WE ENCOURAGE REASONABLE AND COURTEOUS COMMENTS THAT:

1. Create conversation on issues of interest and concern to fellow readers and local community members.
2. Express opinions and contrarian views.
3. Stimulate debate with respectful language.
4. Stay within the boundaries of these rules.

WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO SUSPEND OR TERMINATE ACCESS FOR:

1. Violating any of these Online Rules of Conduct.
2. Deliberately disrupting discussions with repetitive messages, meaningless messages or spam.
3. Misrepresentation of identity or impersonating another user.

WE WELCOME:

1. Flagging violations of these rules that you observe to our attention.

MONITORING:

We monitor comments regularly Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Approval of comments outside of this time (including weekends) will be sporadic.

comments powered by Disqus

February 12, 2011

Editor's Notebook: Saying 'no' can be toughest part of job

Anonymous Daily Star The Daily Star Sat Feb 12, 2011, 09:45 AM EST

One of the hardest things about the job of an assignment editor is having to say "no" _ and there are a lot of reasons I have to do just that on a near-daily basis.

Sometimes people ask us to do stories about things happening outside of the area. A very nice woman from Fort Stanwix called me Friday, eager to send me news of the many interesting goings-on at the monument, which is in Rome, N.Y. She seemed incredulous that The Daily Star's calendar of events is limited only to those things that are happening in or near the newspaper's coverage area.

The nice woman argued that many of the fort's visitors are from the Oneonta area _ which I don't doubt. But if that were our sole criterion, where would it end? People from around here routinely travel to Albany, Binghamton, New York City, Florida _ the list goes on. My job, as I see it, is to make sure we tell the world about what's going on here. We're proud to be a member of The Associated Press, and to bring you news of state, national and world significance. But I'm more proud of our commitment to the local community. And in this digital age, there are nearly infinite ways to find out what's going on in the rest of the world.

Another reason we sometimes have to say "no" is because what matters dearly to one person may not be of abiding interest to all of our readers.

Several weeks ago, a woman came to me in tears, asking if we would do a story about her lost dog. It felt cruel to tell her "no," but I did, after not finding a satisfactory answer to the question, "What makes this lost dog different from any other?"

When my reporters pitch story ideas to me, they have to fill out a form that includes several questions. Some of them are practical considerations, like how long they expect the story to be and whether there will be an opportunity for us to get a photograph to illustrate the story. The most important question, and sometimes the hardest to answer, is, "Why do we care?" If we can't answer that question, we figure our readers will wonder the same thing.

Some of you may be thinking, "I might have cared about a missing dog." But what happens the following week when another person's dog is missing? And the week after that? How do we tell that person "no" when we told someone else "yes"? And would you keep caring about missing dogs if you were reading about them every day?

As hard as these questions are to answer, they're not the sort of thing that keeps an editor awake at night, staring at the ceiling. That category is reserved for errors.

Mistakes make an editor's blood run cold, because we know that each and every one of them calls our credibility into question. The logic goes like this: If we're so incompetent that we can't even take down a lottery score, catch obvious spelling errors or other simple tasks, why should we be trusted at all?

It's a harsh analogy, but one that I understand. I blanch when I see typos in the New York Times, and I scoff at misspellings on official documents. That's why I sit down every day with my boss, editor Sam Pollak, and the members of our copy desk, and talk about all the things we screwed up the night before.

It's not a particularly fun conversation, but it's an extremely important one. Much as we want to excuse away our mistakes, we can't. All we can do is try to avoid them in the future.

Emily F. Popek is assistant editor of The Daily Star. She can be reached at 432-1000, ext. 217, or epopek@thedailystar.com.