The Daily Star, Oneonta, NY - otsego county news, delaware county news, oneonta news, oneonta sports

Opinion

August 11, 2012

'Quote approval' crosses an ethical line

The New York Times raised eyebrows recently with a report about the rise of a questionable practice in journalism called quote approval.

Reporters seeking to cover President Barack Obama and challenger Mitt Romney have frequently been offered interviews only after agreeing to submit quotes to the campaigns for approval before printing them. With this stipulation -- dubbed "revise and consent" by Carl Sessions Stepp of American Journalism Review -- the campaigns can rigidly adhere to their message despite occasional slips of the tongue.

"Jim Messina, the Obama campaign manager, can be foul-mouthed," the Times' Jeremy Peters wrote. "But readers would not know it because he deletes the curse words before approving the quotes. … Stuart Stevens, the senior Romney strategist, is fond of disparaging political opponents by quoting authors like Walt Whitman and referring to historical figures like H.R. Haldeman, Richard Nixon's chief of staff. But such clever lines rarely make it past Mr. Stevens."

For journalists to be complicit in sanitizing their sources' statements is ethically dubious. But with media outlets such as Bloomberg News, The Washington Post, Reuters and the New York Times agreeing to quote approval, a "go along to get along" attitude is often the only way to gain access to those who make the news.

"We don't like the practice," New York Times Managing Editor Dean Baquet said. "We encourage our reporters to push back. Unfortunately, this practice is becoming increasingly common, and maybe we have to push back harder."

The Associated Press, to its credit, has taken a firm stance against the practice. (The same goes for The Daily Star.)

"We don't permit quote approval. We have declined interviews that have come with this contingency." AP bureau chief Sally Buzbee said to the Poynter Institute.

Quote approval can be useful for stories involving, for example, scientists who use esoteric technical jargon. But, as former Bush administration press secretary Ari Fleischer said in a CNN op-ed this week, such is not the case for the vast majority of sources who demand quote approval.

"Pushback has now turned into quote approval for everyone, even when the story isn't nuanced or complicated," Fleischer wrote. "Reporters are easily acquiescing to midlevel aides who seek quote approval. … As a former press secretary, I'm all for trying to control the press, but quote approval goes too far."

The relationship between reporters and sources will always be part-collegial, part-adversarial. But this give-and-take crosses the line when coddling sources is raised to greater importance than providing readers with honest coverage.

Text Only
Opinion

Additional Content
Join the Debate
Helium
Additional Resources
CNHI News Service
Poll

Which is the most important issue?

Benghazi
The IRS
The Associated Press subpoena
     View Results