The Daily Star, Oneonta, NY - otsego county news, delaware county news, oneonta news, oneonta sports

April 21, 2009

Jury begins deliberation in rape trial

Fails to reach verdict Monday; will resume discussing case today


By Jake Palmateer
Staff Writer

COOPERSTOWN _ The jury in the trial of Justin Gillingham failed to reach a verdict Monday after nearly 3½ hours of deliberation. Gillingham, 24, of Oneonta, is accused of first-degree rape, second-degree attempted murder and second-degree assault in connection with the alleged attack on the then 23-year-old State University College at Oneonta senior at about 2:40 a.m. May 16 on a dark path between campus and Clinton Street. His trial at the Otsego County Courthouse before state Supreme Court Justice Michael Coccoma began last Monday with jury selection.

It will enter a seventh day today when the jury resumes deliberation at 9:30 a.m.

The jury was handed the case from Coccoma for deliberation at about 4:30 p.m. Jurors took a 20-minute break at 5 p.m. Food was delivered to the jury room at about 6 p.m. The jury also took a 15-minute break at 7:20 p.m.

Coccoma sent the jurors home at 8:30 p.m. after emphatically telling them not to think about the case, discuss it with anyone, do their own research or visit the scene of the alleged crime.

“You must resist that temptation,” Coccoma said.

The alleged victim testified Tuesday that Gillingham suddenly assaulted her, raped her and tried to kill her by attempting to snap her neck three times. The defense is admitting an assault occurred, but said in its opening statement the alleged victim first bit Gillingham’s tongue while they were “making out” on the path, and he punched her in response and fled. Gillingham, who testified Friday, said he lied to police when he told them he was jumped by four men.

Both agreed they had just met that night and smoked marijuana together at Gillingham’s house before he accompanied her back to campus in her car. Public Defender Richard “Otto” Rothermel and Otsego County District Attorney John Muehl delivered closing arguments earlier on Monday.

“It’s my privilege and awesome duty to represent an innocent man,” Rothermel told the 12-member jury and four alternate jurors.

Rothermel said life was going “pretty well” for Gillingham, who had been working a full-time job after gaining a GED and culinary certificate from the Oneonta Job Corps Academy.

“He was a normal and everyday kid until May 16, 2008,” Rothermel said.

That day, Gillingham made four mistakes _ getting involved with the alleged rape victim; getting involved with someone who had a boyfriend; “losing it” when she bit his tongue; and lying to the police afterward, Rothermel said during his 1½-hour summation.

But raping or try to kill the alleged victim were not among those mistakes, he said.

Rothermel went witness-by-witness to explain what he said was the evidence exonerating his client, as well as the inconsistencies in the police investigation and the testimony of the alleged victim. “The cracks in this case are like the Grand Canyon,” Rothermel said. “This isn’t an investigation. This is an inquisition.”

In his 35-minute closing argument, Muehl said Rothermel’s case was focused on minor inconsistencies in evidence and witness testimony. “I submit to you those weren’t even issues in the case. They were brought up as red herrings,” Muehl said. “Of course you are going to have some inconsistencies. This case is a year old.”

But Muehl said the woman’s version of events is more consistent over time than Gillingham’s. “I submit to you that (the woman) has no motive to lie about the rape or the attempted murder,” Muehl said.

Muehl said the defense’s suggestion that the alleged rape and attempted murder were somehow staged by the woman defies common sense.

“If she staged this rape and attempted murder, she should have been a drama major,” Muehl said. “The bottom line is if you believe (the alleged victim), you have to find the defendant guilty.”

In his instructions, Coccoma explained to the jury it could consider a misdemeanor charge of thirddegree assault if there was no finding of guilt on the first-degree rape or second-degree attempted murder charge.

A conviction of second-degree assault, a felony, is predicated on whether the separate felonies of first-degree rape and/or second-degree attempted murder were committed during the alleged assault, Coccoma said.