Recent plans by the State University College at Oneonta to expand its reach into the community have threatened to change the character of several neighborhoods here in the city.
Not only will the anticipated townhouses on the western edge of the college campus above Clinton Street affect the immediate neighbors with traffic, noise and light pollution, but it has come to light that the university's Board of Trustees in Albany is nearing completion of several land purchases of several acres along the south edge of the campus at a cost of $320,000. These will allow further college construction into the areas north of Normal Avenue, Cedar Street and Monroe Avenue.
These purchases, whose relationship to the townhouse development is unclear, will remove these acres from our tax base and from any local zoning and environmental control.
Plans are already in the works to encircle the Old Main Townhouse and the Bugbee building, creating an entrance to the campus with a new road directly behind the modest houses on the north side of Normal Avenue. Those families will be faced with student traffic in their backyards at all hours that will threaten safety and quiet of those families and their children.
Among the many issues raised by all this activity is the process the college used to acquire some of these parcels. The records indicate that two parcels above Cedar Street were purchased, not by the college directly, but rather by the College at Oneonta Foundation, a separate nonprofit entity, governed by a board that includes SUCO administrators.
The foundation's stated mission is "to raise and administer gifts and grants to enhance the academic status of the college through endowment, scholarships, and institutional programs."
Of course, we don't know what discussions have taken place regarding the purchase of this property, but if the foundation then had given the land to the college for academic purposes, our issues would have been limited to the need for and the use of those properties that justify removing them from the county and city tax base.
But to add to the confusion about the foundation's mission, in March, the chancellor of the State University system in Albany, as part of the $320,000 purchase package, requested $70,000 of state money to reimburse the foundation for the land it purchased. This request changed the role of the foundation from benefactor of the college to that of a shell corporation, whose additional role now is to float bridge loans for projects that might suffer controversy in the light of day.
By seeking reimbursement from the state, the board of the foundation now suffers the embarrassment of having its fundamental credibility and integrity questioned. In addition, as the foundation board lists high-ranking college officials in its membership, the college not only has to answer for its controversial land purchases, but it has to own the embarrassment of the foundation's role in the process.
I doubt the generous local donors to the foundation had any idea that their money might be used in a financial scheme to remove land from our tax base and devalue the properties of their neighbors.
Questionable land purchases aside, there is also the question of the rationale of increasing the availability of on-campus housing for its students. Whatever other rationales colleges use for building on-campus housing, the fact is that on-campus housing brings in net revenue to colleges.
Construction bonds are issued by the state to cover the construction, and housing fees charged to resident students more than covers the college's bond payments.
As a consequence, moving 200 students from the Oneonta rental market redirects more than $600,000 away from our community and local businesses to enhance the revenues of the college and state bond holders.
Removing those 200 students from the rental market will also create vacancies in perhaps 60 three-person rental units. Without that demand for housing, the value of the rental inventory in the community will decrease and so will the incentives to maintain any attractiveness of these properties.
It is clear that the population of the area is not seeing a lot of growth, and given the number of "for sale" signs around, it is likely that some of these properties will be neglected and end up like the condemned property on the corner of Spruce Street and Ford Avenue. Condemned houses add even more to the tax burden of the rest of us, and obviously reduce the attractiveness of the city.
Finally, there is the question of the role of the college in the bigger picture of public education. The chancellor, speaking for the college in her $320,000 requests to her board, justifies the new housing in the following way:
"This new facility will help the college meet residential demand, fill a gap in its current student housing portfolio and help the college avoid a competitive disadvantage in attracting and retaining academically well-qualified students."
There is nothing in this rationale that mentions improving the education of the students. Rather, by implication, the college can do a better job only by accepting better students.
I'm particularly troubled by the term "competitive disadvantage." In the last decade, public four-year institutions were educating some 60 percent of New York students. If one includes students at community colleges, the percentage of the publicly educated would be much higher. In addition, there have been no significant changes in the annual number of New York births in the last decade, so the number of potential students is not going to change.
If the college thinks it is competing against the private college sector, I wonder about the rationale for that competition, as the missions of private colleges without the same level of state funding are usually quite different.
If, as I think is the more likely case, the college sees itself competing with the other state-supported colleges like Geneseo, then it appears that we are witnessing, at our expense, a resume-building skirmish in a turf war within the University system itself.
Not only do our state taxes fund that war, but they are funding a likely increase in our local tax burden as well, all with the help of the college foundation's questionable use of tax-free private donations.
John Willis has lived next to a student rental on Cedar Street for more than 20 years and is a retired Hartwick College administrator.
Columns
SUNY Oneonta expansion will be bad for city
- Big Chuck D'Imperio
-
-
Safety Patrol D.C. visits never get old
I asked Cam Morris, head of Eastern Travel/Oneonta Bus Lines, how many years her company has been handling the Safety Patrol trip to Washington, D.C.
Continued ... - My pal Brucie, savior of Sidney's hospital
- Catching a whiff of 'Vermont Vapor'
- Selections from the virtual mailbag
- Recalling days of 'Doughnut King'
-
Safety Patrol D.C. visits never get old
- Cary Brunswick
-
-
We've become our own worst enemies
The past month has been marked by a seeming unprecedented number of man-made tragedies, as distinct from those caused by violent outbursts of the natural world, such as earthquakes, hurricanes and tsunamis.
Continued ... - Plenty of blame to go around for Bangladesh horror
- Obama is going against his word on Social Security
- Reflecting on a Florida trip
- Those magnificent spies in their flying machines
-
We've become our own worst enemies
- Chuck Pinkey
- Guest Column
-
-
Records seizure is an insult to free press
Distrust of government secrecy has been elevated to an exceptional level with the disclosure the Justice Department covertly examined two months of Associated Press phone records to determine who leaked details to the AP about a foiled terrorist plot.
Continued ... - The evangelical view of same-sex marriage
- Manor's fate will be Otsego board's legacy
- A closer look at our economy - Part II
- Use fracking to fill budget gaps
-
Records seizure is an insult to free press
- Lisa Miller
-
-
A view from above
Fire towers in the Catskill Mountains have always been destination points, built to capture some of the region’s best views. These sentinel stations served an important role for the earliest possible sightings of forest fires in the remote mountain ranges. But the fire towers and those who manned them fulfilled a multitude of other roles as well.
Continued ... - Being a parent is a constant learning process
- Healthy doesn't have to mean expensive
- A family era ends with close of Potter series
- Independent stores make up for loss of Borders
-
- Mark Simonson
-
-
General Clinton Canoe Regatta got a new home in 1972
Ever since 1963, when Charles Hinkley and a group of Tri-Town businessmen came up with the idea for what we know today as the General Clinton Canoe Regatta, people lined the shores of the Susquehanna to watch the canoeists as they made their 70-mile trek from Cooperstown to Bainbridge.
Continued ... - Sunday movies in Oneonta finally shown in 1934
- Politics, fitness and landmarks dominated local news in May 1968
- Local people sought income in many ways in 1933
- Local windstorm in 1983 caused tense moments
-
- Rick Brockway
-
-
Kids have sparkle in their eyes
When I was in my teens, old Bill Naatz told me about a stream north of Lake George where a man had panned out enough gold to make his wife a wedding band. It was all rumors, but to his grandson and myself, it sounded like the makings of a great adventure.
- People make the outdoors even better
- Turkey season has ups and downs
- Spring air isn't always the freshest
- Adriondacks keep growing and growing
-
Kids have sparkle in their eyes
- Sam Pollak
- William Masters
-
-
Schreibman tops Chris Gibson on women's issues
As the time to vote draws near, we need to remember how money can run politics more than we can. Raising funds is a prominent (if not the dominant) task of getting elected. Raising issues is also crucial, but those efforts are subject to distortion and fear-mongering.
- Republicans feelentitled to allthey can garner An entitlement is a legal benefit available from the government to individuals who are within a defined category of recipients, such as needing insurance for unemployment or health services.
-
Romney focuses on self; Obama emphasizes unity
Mitt Romney criticizes President Obama for saying a person's success is rooted in his community, and is not all his alone. Romney belittles this with his belief in individual initiative. He is better at the put-down than the push-up.
-
Romney shows little regard for common man
The Republicans in Congress have voted over and over, 33 times, redundantly and uselessly, to rescind what they call Obamacare.
-
Scouts' gay ban creates problem where none exists
The Boy Scouts of America's "emphatic reaffirmation" of its vow to exclude any and all homosexuals from its hallowed ranks is ill-considered and pathetic, especially in view of its having reviewed the matter for two years.
-
Schreibman tops Chris Gibson on women's issues
