Recent plans by the State University College at Oneonta to expand its reach into the community have threatened to change the character of several neighborhoods here in the city.
Not only will the anticipated townhouses on the western edge of the college campus above Clinton Street affect the immediate neighbors with traffic, noise and light pollution, but it has come to light that the university's Board of Trustees in Albany is nearing completion of several land purchases of several acres along the south edge of the campus at a cost of $320,000. These will allow further college construction into the areas north of Normal Avenue, Cedar Street and Monroe Avenue.
These purchases, whose relationship to the townhouse development is unclear, will remove these acres from our tax base and from any local zoning and environmental control.
Plans are already in the works to encircle the Old Main Townhouse and the Bugbee building, creating an entrance to the campus with a new road directly behind the modest houses on the north side of Normal Avenue. Those families will be faced with student traffic in their backyards at all hours that will threaten safety and quiet of those families and their children.
Among the many issues raised by all this activity is the process the college used to acquire some of these parcels. The records indicate that two parcels above Cedar Street were purchased, not by the college directly, but rather by the College at Oneonta Foundation, a separate nonprofit entity, governed by a board that includes SUCO administrators.
The foundation's stated mission is "to raise and administer gifts and grants to enhance the academic status of the college through endowment, scholarships, and institutional programs."
Of course, we don't know what discussions have taken place regarding the purchase of this property, but if the foundation then had given the land to the college for academic purposes, our issues would have been limited to the need for and the use of those properties that justify removing them from the county and city tax base.
But to add to the confusion about the foundation's mission, in March, the chancellor of the State University system in Albany, as part of the $320,000 purchase package, requested $70,000 of state money to reimburse the foundation for the land it purchased. This request changed the role of the foundation from benefactor of the college to that of a shell corporation, whose additional role now is to float bridge loans for projects that might suffer controversy in the light of day.
By seeking reimbursement from the state, the board of the foundation now suffers the embarrassment of having its fundamental credibility and integrity questioned. In addition, as the foundation board lists high-ranking college officials in its membership, the college not only has to answer for its controversial land purchases, but it has to own the embarrassment of the foundation's role in the process.
I doubt the generous local donors to the foundation had any idea that their money might be used in a financial scheme to remove land from our tax base and devalue the properties of their neighbors.
Questionable land purchases aside, there is also the question of the rationale of increasing the availability of on-campus housing for its students. Whatever other rationales colleges use for building on-campus housing, the fact is that on-campus housing brings in net revenue to colleges.
Construction bonds are issued by the state to cover the construction, and housing fees charged to resident students more than covers the college's bond payments.
As a consequence, moving 200 students from the Oneonta rental market redirects more than $600,000 away from our community and local businesses to enhance the revenues of the college and state bond holders.
Removing those 200 students from the rental market will also create vacancies in perhaps 60 three-person rental units. Without that demand for housing, the value of the rental inventory in the community will decrease and so will the incentives to maintain any attractiveness of these properties.
It is clear that the population of the area is not seeing a lot of growth, and given the number of "for sale" signs around, it is likely that some of these properties will be neglected and end up like the condemned property on the corner of Spruce Street and Ford Avenue. Condemned houses add even more to the tax burden of the rest of us, and obviously reduce the attractiveness of the city.
Finally, there is the question of the role of the college in the bigger picture of public education. The chancellor, speaking for the college in her $320,000 requests to her board, justifies the new housing in the following way:
"This new facility will help the college meet residential demand, fill a gap in its current student housing portfolio and help the college avoid a competitive disadvantage in attracting and retaining academically well-qualified students."
There is nothing in this rationale that mentions improving the education of the students. Rather, by implication, the college can do a better job only by accepting better students.
I'm particularly troubled by the term "competitive disadvantage." In the last decade, public four-year institutions were educating some 60 percent of New York students. If one includes students at community colleges, the percentage of the publicly educated would be much higher. In addition, there have been no significant changes in the annual number of New York births in the last decade, so the number of potential students is not going to change.
If the college thinks it is competing against the private college sector, I wonder about the rationale for that competition, as the missions of private colleges without the same level of state funding are usually quite different.
If, as I think is the more likely case, the college sees itself competing with the other state-supported colleges like Geneseo, then it appears that we are witnessing, at our expense, a resume-building skirmish in a turf war within the University system itself.
Not only do our state taxes fund that war, but they are funding a likely increase in our local tax burden as well, all with the help of the college foundation's questionable use of tax-free private donations.
John Willis has lived next to a student rental on Cedar Street for more than 20 years and is a retired Hartwick College administrator.
Columns
SUNY Oneonta expansion will be bad for city
- Big Chuck D'Imperio
- Cary Brunswick
-
-
Some wisdom is best passed down through books
I was visiting a friend out-of-town recently and the subject of providing a "reading list" to young people came up in conversation. He said years ago he had asked a respected acquaintance in Oneonta to compile such a list for his teenage daughter, to help her be better prepared for life, culture, education, politics and people.
Continued ... - Let pragmatism, not politics, determine birth control debate
- As Center Street Elementary goes, so goes Center City
- U.S. intervention in Syria's uprising would be a gamble
- Santorum, Obama both got it wrong on Honduras
-
Some wisdom is best passed down through books
- Chuck Pinkey
- Guest Column
-
-
If we don’t develop a sustainable system, who will?
In Otsego County’s local elections last fall, a number of candidates — most of them on the independent Sustainable Otsego line — ran on an anti-fracking, pro-sustainability platform. They recognized that our current way of life — dependent on increasingly scarce, costly and polluting fossil fuels — cannot continue.
Continued ... - Time to get off the bus and on the computer
- Cuomo's Machiavellian maneuvers are a danger
- Home rule laws aren't a radical idea
- Sustainable shouldn't be a dirty word
-
If we don’t develop a sustainable system, who will?
- Lisa Miller
-
-
Being a parent is a constant learning process
I am sitting cross-legged on the floor in the dressing room, waiting for Allie's dance number to be called. The cave girl costume has been donned, the jazz shoes double-tied, the hair pulled back, the requisite dab of lipstick applied.
Continued ... - Healthy doesn't have to mean expensive
- A family era ends with close of Potter series
- Independent stores make up for loss of Borders
- Untethered from the cable box
-
Being a parent is a constant learning process
- Mark Simonson
-
-
Perfect attendance by Saturday’s Bread for 20 years in Oneonta
Oneonta became a settlement and has been a place to do one's "trading," whether it was the 18th century, or 2012, because of the five valleys that converge here. Only the places of doing the "trading" have changed a bit over the last 100 years, and Oneonta remains a place that attracts visitors and has always been a decent place to live and work.
Continued ...
100 Years Ago - Recalling the Hindenburg, John D. Rockefeller in May 1937
- Oneonta residents had diversions aplenty in the spring of 1952
- Damaschke essential to ensuring Oneonta baseball in 1927
- Area tunes to WONT in November 1972
-
Perfect attendance by Saturday’s Bread for 20 years in Oneonta
- Rick Brockway
-
-
Climbing is one thing, but skydiving?
OUTDOORS COLUMN BY RICK BROCKWAY ... Last week, my friend George and I returned to the Gunks for another rock-climbing adventure. After last week's column, I asked about the rattlesnakes and was told not to worry. Rattlers are usually quite timid and will avoid people as much as possible. It's the copperheads that'll give you trouble. They're aggressive and will stand their ground to defend it. Oh great!!
- Rattlesnakes may be closer than you think, so pay attention
- Spring is here, so fishing should pick up soon
- Sneaky fox may be the next animal looking to horse around
- Pass down the rush of turkey hunting to your kids this weekend
-
Climbing is one thing, but skydiving?
- Sam Pollak
-
-
I'm happy with our kids to a certain degree
It was several years ago, and I was in the kitchen, telling my eldest daughter and my then-teenaged son about the person who was taking over as publisher at The Daily Star.
Continued ... - I get by with a little help from my 'friends'
- It’s not easy for a politics junkie to get off the stuff
- The Encyclopaedia Britannica in print, unmourned by me
- Angelo Dundee was always a good man to have in your corner
-
I'm happy with our kids to a certain degree
- William Masters
-
-
Time for lawmakers who put needs of society first
Richard Lugar, after six terms as a Republican senator -- known for his middle of the road rationality and his foreign policy finesse -- has been ousted by a Tea Party extremist backed by outside right-wing funding.
-
War not worth gambling with lives of soldiers
Are you not tired of our war in Afghanistan? It had a point, once, after 9/11. Bush couldn't distinguish his myopic personal agendas from the nation's needs and let Osama escape, dropping the ball entirely, causing many deaths.
-
Titanic was a microcosm of U.S. economic disparity
Haunting reminders of the Titanic tragedy have wafted over us with the centenary of its sinking. The maiden voyage of an impressive, state of the art vessel, was a little like that of the Challenger space shuttle, at the cutting edge of developing technology. But the shuttle carried our pride in science and space exploration, not hundreds and hundreds of people.
-
William Masters: Nation stands divided between 'us' and 'them'
In February, Trayvon Martin was shot dead as "suspicious" by a volunteer neighborhood watch man. The case has aroused community reaction in Sanford, Fla., and is still echoing across the country.
-
A quarterback can't win the game alone
What is the relationship between democracy and wealth? Democracy is a political system, while wealth relates to economics. We have equal political rights, but we don't all have money. Extreme differences destroy the continuity of community solidarity.
-
Time for lawmakers who put needs of society first

