The Daily Star, Oneonta, NY - otsego county news, delaware county news, oneonta news, oneonta sports

Columns

January 9, 2012

Two charter revision failures preceded the 2011 success

The year 2011 was quite historic for Oneonta, regarding its city charter and the organization of city government. Some may not realize that these changes were a long time in the making, and the success achieved in 2011 was the third attempt to make major changes in the charter.

Apparently not much attention was paid to the charter before 1947. According to The Oneonta Star of Wednesday, Aug. 6, 1947, "After two years of painstaking search, Oneonta's city charter has at last been tracked down, isolated and identified, Mayor A.F. Carson told the Common council last night.

"The feat was accomplished by the charter revision commission headed by Louis M. Baker, who did the major portion of the work himself."

Mayor Carson said Baker was the only person who had the complete charter in one piece in one spot.

Together it filled four large loose-leaf volumes. It was ready to be typed and copied so revisions could be made, a task completed in 1948.

While nothing major came from those revisions, it was in May 1960 when Oneonta first began considering a change in city government. Mayor James N. Georgeson and a few aldermen from Common Council made a trip to Albany to discuss possible changes in the charter and the form of government, with the State Department of Audit and Control.

A Charter Revision Committee was formed that year, headed by Francis Feeney, Second Ward alderman. Feeney and other Common Council members initially supported a "strong mayor" type of government.

Mayor Georgeson had gone on record as supporting what was the current form of government.

The charter review was completed by January 1961. The strong mayor form had been altered a bit to a city manager-council type of government by Feeney and the Charter Revision Committee. A public meeting on May 23 drew only seven interested taxpayers, with the rest in attendance being past and present city officials.

The proposed changes never went to a public vote that year. On June 12, Mayor Georgeson said that Oneonta "is not ready for city management." The Charter Revision Committee said it would continue to work on the charter but couldn't promise when it would be ready.

The charter plan was finally presented Tuesday, March 6, 1962, that continued to promote a city manager, and a mayor to become a voting member of Common Council.

The Revision Committee staged a vigorous public education campaign that autumn, as a referendum would be put on the November ballot. Albert S. Nader, a new mayor who had taken office in 1962, was joined in opposition to changes in the charter by former mayors Alexander Carson, Roger Hughes and James Georgeson.

The revised city charter went down in defeat Tuesday, Nov. 6, by a 3-2 margin at the polls.

Interestingly, 840 people somehow totally ignored the proposal on the ballot. The new charter lost by 643 votes.

Although nothing drastic came from this round, some revisions were made to the charter in 1964, according to The Daily Star of June 1, 2011.

Once again, the charter came up for a public vote in November 1982. A revision commission had been working for the previous 18 months on changes. There was no city manager proposed this time.

The mayor would have been removed from the Common Council and taken a stronger role in the city government, directing department heads and preparing budgets.

The proposal went to down to defeat again, but by a narrow margin.

While 3,500 Oneonta voters cast their ballots in the general election Tuesday, Nov. 2, only 53 percent voted on the charter.

Joseph P. Molinari Jr., chairman of the revision committee, attributed the low vote to a lack of public interest.

"It's a very uninteresting subject," Molinari said. "It's not something that reaches out and grabs you." While Mayor James F. Lettis had supported the revision, former mayors Nader, Hughes and Georgeson had opposed it.

The charter remained unchanged until another commission was appointed by Mayor John Nader in 2007, beginning the effort toward the successful charter revision in 2011.

This weekend: The newspaper business was anything but easy in Oneonta in 1862.

City Historian Mark Simonson's column appears twice weekly. On Saturdays, his column focuses on the area during the Depression and before. His Monday columns address local history after the Depression. If you have feedback or ideas about the column, write to him at The Daily Star, or email him at simmark@stny.rr.com. His website is www.oneontahistorian.com. His columns can be found at www.thedailystar.com/marksimonson.

Text Only
Big Chuck D'Imperio
Cary Brunswick

Chuck Pinkey
Guest Column

Lisa Miller

Mark Simonson

Rick Brockway

Sam Pollak
William Masters
  • Time for lawmakers who put needs of society first

    Richard Lugar, after six terms as a Republican senator -- known for his middle of the road rationality and his foreign policy finesse -- has been ousted by a Tea Party extremist backed by outside right-wing funding.

    May 15, 2012

  • War not worth gambling with lives of soldiers

    Are you not tired of our war in Afghanistan? It had a point, once, after 9/11. Bush couldn't distinguish his myopic personal agendas from the nation's needs and let Osama escape, dropping the ball entirely, causing many deaths.

    May 1, 2012

  • Titanic was a microcosm of U.S. economic disparity

    Haunting reminders of the Titanic tragedy have wafted over us with the centenary of its sinking. The maiden voyage of an impressive, state of the art vessel, was a little like that of the Challenger space shuttle, at the cutting edge of developing technology. But the shuttle carried our pride in science and space exploration, not hundreds and hundreds of people.

    April 17, 2012

  • William Masters: Nation stands divided between 'us' and 'them'

    In February, Trayvon Martin was shot dead as "suspicious" by a volunteer neighborhood watch man. The case has aroused community reaction in Sanford, Fla., and is still echoing across the country.

    April 3, 2012

  • A quarterback can't win the game alone

    What is the relationship between democracy and wealth? Democracy is a political system, while wealth relates to economics. We have equal political rights, but we don't all have money. Extreme differences destroy the continuity of community solidarity.

    March 20, 2012

Additional Content
Join the Debate
Helium
Additional Resources
CNHI News Service
Poll

Should high schoolers play football despite the risk of concussions.

Yes
No
     View Results