This burning question has been puzzling philosophers, scientists, theologians and song lyricists for decades.
Does your chewing gum lose its flavor on the bedpost overnight?
In these virulently partisan times, the answer shall likely have to wait for the Supreme Court to weigh in. Meanwhile, I've got several more thoughts attached to question marks.
Does anybody else feel like I do that after his racist, xenophobic, anti-Semitic and misogynistic diatribes, it's just impossible to enjoy any of Mel Gibson's rather excellent movies?
For that matter, doesn't the same go for the work of admitted rapist and pedophile Roman Polanski, a movie director who is free to spend the rest of his sordid life frolicking as long as it's not in the United States?
While I'm at it, can anyone explain the adoration still exhibited toward the late Michael Jackson despite his paying millions of dollars to little boys presumably so they wouldn't testify about what he did with them while they shared a bed?
What _ or who _ is a Lady Gaga?
Is there a Lord Gaga?
Are there any scientists more brilliant than those in the employ of the Gillette company that charges so much for its Fusion razors?
How they can create blades that give you a wonderfully smooth first shave and still self-destruct so quickly that your fifth shave feels like you're using sandpaper is a feat so technologically impressive that you wish these guys were working for NASA.
I know he has a huge following, but how can all those Republican senators, governors and other serious men and women continue to bow and scrape to radio blowhard Rush
Limbaugh, particularly after the racist stuff he said about George Steinbrenner on the day he died?
"That cracker made a lot of African-American millionaires," Limbaugh said Tuesday on his show. "He fired a bunch of white guys as managers left and right."
We can only speculate why skin color entered into the guy's thought processes right after the Yankees' owner died, but isn't it most likely that it was just because Rush Limbaugh happens to be a racist?
I can understand taking in your kid's games at the park, but why would anyone watch a pro soccer match on TV if there is a baseball game on at the same time?
Did you notice that once the American soccer team lost to mighty Ghana in the World Cup that wherever you went around here, nobody was talking about soccer?
All the ESPN horses and all NIKE's men and promotions couldn't put any of the trumped-up interest in the soccer tournament back together again once the Americans were out of it.
So, no, despite the millions of kids who play the sport and its improved but still-paltry TV ratings, professional soccer in this country can go back to the obscurity it deserves until the next World Cup in four years.
Need any more proof that most Americans watch an international sport more out of patriotism than anything else?
OK, who's leading the Tour de France bicycle race now that Texan Lance Armstrong has faded away?
I don't know, either.
How much time do you think President Barack Obama spends praying that Sarah Palin is the Republican nominee in 2012?
Can you watch a network baseball game without giggling when the announcers postulate on why there are fewer home runs than there used to be ... and the subject of steroids never comes up?
Why are the Drudge Report, Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe and other right-wing deniers of the overwhelming evidence of global warming so silent when it's 90-plus degrees up and down the East Coast?
Of course, it's just as ridiculous to use a hot July day in only one part of the planet as proof of global warming as when Drudge and Inhofe use every February blizzard as evidence that there's no such thing.
Hey, it's hot in the summer and cold in the winter, proving absolutely nothing other than that.
Meanwhile, worldwide, 2000-09 was the warmest decade in recorded history.
What do I have to say to all those critics who predicted newspapers would be long gone by now?
We'll be around as long as there are folks who want a credible source for local news and reliable material for wrapping fish.
While the critics' gum is on the bedpost, they can chew on that for a while.
Sam Pollak is the editor of The Daily Star. He can be reached at spollak@thedailystar.com or at (607) 432-1000, ext. 208.
Columns
Related Photos
-
Sam Pollak
Discussion
COMMENTING ON STORIES:
Welcome to our story comments feature. We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including the unpopular ones. We only ask that you keep your conversations clean, civil and on the topic of the story you are commenting on.
Coinciding with our websites redesign, we launched our new story comments feature through Disqus.
Disqus gives users the ability to log into our story comments feature so that they may be able to track their conversations, receive emails when their comments get a reply or to even have your comments update onto your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
For the time being, our story comments feature will continue to have the ability to post comments anonymously. We reserve the right to require registration in the future using your name and verified email address.
Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified at the newspaper’s discretion for a number of different reasons. Please follow our Online Rules of Conduct at all times.
RULES OF CONDUCT:
We reserve the right to remove comments that are unacceptable, to wit:
1. False and inacurate statements.
2. Personal attacks. Explicit name-calling.
3. Harassing, harmful, vulgar, obscene and defamatory language.
4. Threatening statements or statements that suggest violence.
5. Hate speech of any kind.
6. Intolerant comments on religion, race, age, gender, sexual preference or disabilities.
7. Accusations of criminal activity.
8. Content that is harmful to children and minors in any way.
9. References to any type of sexual activity and other private matters.
10. Random and inflammatory statements that are off topic.
11. Advertising of any kind.
12. Typing in all caps.
WE ENCOURAGE REASONABLE AND COURTEOUS COMMENTS THAT:
1. Create conversation on issues of interest and concern to fellow readers and local community members.
2. Express opinions and contrarian views.
3. Stimulate debate with respectful language.
4. Stay within the boundaries of these rules.
WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO SUSPEND OR TERMINATE ACCESS FOR:
1. Violating any of these Online Rules of Conduct.
2. Deliberately disrupting discussions with repetitive messages, meaningless messages or spam.
3. Misrepresentation of identity or impersonating another user.
WE WELCOME:
1. Flagging violations of these rules that you observe to our attention.
MONITORING:
We monitor comments regularly Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Approval of comments outside of this time (including weekends) will be sporadic.
Welcome to our story comments feature. We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including the unpopular ones. We only ask that you keep your conversations clean, civil and on the topic of the story you are commenting on.
Coinciding with our websites redesign, we launched our new story comments feature through Disqus.
Disqus gives users the ability to log into our story comments feature so that they may be able to track their conversations, receive emails when their comments get a reply or to even have your comments update onto your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
For the time being, our story comments feature will continue to have the ability to post comments anonymously. We reserve the right to require registration in the future using your name and verified email address.
Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified at the newspaper’s discretion for a number of different reasons. Please follow our Online Rules of Conduct at all times.
RULES OF CONDUCT:
We reserve the right to remove comments that are unacceptable, to wit:
1. False and inacurate statements.
2. Personal attacks. Explicit name-calling.
3. Harassing, harmful, vulgar, obscene and defamatory language.
4. Threatening statements or statements that suggest violence.
5. Hate speech of any kind.
6. Intolerant comments on religion, race, age, gender, sexual preference or disabilities.
7. Accusations of criminal activity.
8. Content that is harmful to children and minors in any way.
9. References to any type of sexual activity and other private matters.
10. Random and inflammatory statements that are off topic.
11. Advertising of any kind.
12. Typing in all caps.
WE ENCOURAGE REASONABLE AND COURTEOUS COMMENTS THAT:
1. Create conversation on issues of interest and concern to fellow readers and local community members.
2. Express opinions and contrarian views.
3. Stimulate debate with respectful language.
4. Stay within the boundaries of these rules.
WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO SUSPEND OR TERMINATE ACCESS FOR:
1. Violating any of these Online Rules of Conduct.
2. Deliberately disrupting discussions with repetitive messages, meaningless messages or spam.
3. Misrepresentation of identity or impersonating another user.
WE WELCOME:
1. Flagging violations of these rules that you observe to our attention.
MONITORING:
We monitor comments regularly Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Approval of comments outside of this time (including weekends) will be sporadic.
July 17, 2010
Chewing on current events can be a sticky situation
- Big Chuck D'Imperio
-
-
Upstate theme parks offered affordable thrills
I saw in the news last week that Disney theme parks are raising admission prices to almost $100 a person. Children (who Uncle Walt considers 10 and under) are now $86 a day.
Continued ... - Getting creative with gifts for grads
- Safety Patrol D.C. visits never get old
- My pal Brucie, savior of Sidney's hospital
- Catching a whiff of 'Vermont Vapor'
-
Upstate theme parks offered affordable thrills
- Cary Brunswick
-
-
Book-banning has a tendency to backfire
So what does the 1960s game show ``What's My Line'' got to do with the Bloomsday festivities occurring in Dublin, Ireland, this week? Surprisingly, there is a link.
Continued ... - Envisioning a world without terror
- We've become our own worst enemies
- Plenty of blame to go around for Bangladesh horror
- Obama is going against his word on Social Security
-
Book-banning has a tendency to backfire
- Chuck Pinkey
- Guest Column
- Lisa Miller
-
-
A view from above
Fire towers in the Catskill Mountains have always been destination points, built to capture some of the region’s best views. These sentinel stations served an important role for the earliest possible sightings of forest fires in the remote mountain ranges. But the fire towers and those who manned them fulfilled a multitude of other roles as well.
Continued ... - Being a parent is a constant learning process
- Healthy doesn't have to mean expensive
- A family era ends with close of Potter series
- Independent stores make up for loss of Borders
-
- Mark Simonson
- Rick Brockway
-
-
Don't play around with snappers
The other day, I was driving along Route 205 between Mount Vision and Hartwick. Suddenly, I had to swerve out of my lane to miss a huge snapping turtle. It was crossing from a large swamp on the left to some higher ground on the other side of the road.
- Emmons Pond Bog is pretty easy to enjoy
- Fishing has gotten a lot more complex
- Waterfalls are even better when you keep them to yourself
- Kids have sparkle in their eyes
-
Don't play around with snappers
- Sam Pollak
-
-
Justice Dept., IRS abuses worth screaming about
"If this had happened while a Republican was president, the liberal media would be screaming."
Continued ... - THIS WEEK'S POLL
- Using time off in the worst way possible
- Terror lives on, and there's no end in sight
- Remembering the glory of their times
-
Justice Dept., IRS abuses worth screaming about
- William Masters
-
-
Schreibman tops Chris Gibson on women's issues
As the time to vote draws near, we need to remember how money can run politics more than we can. Raising funds is a prominent (if not the dominant) task of getting elected. Raising issues is also crucial, but those efforts are subject to distortion and fear-mongering.
- Republicans feelentitled to allthey can garner An entitlement is a legal benefit available from the government to individuals who are within a defined category of recipients, such as needing insurance for unemployment or health services.
-
Romney focuses on self; Obama emphasizes unity
Mitt Romney criticizes President Obama for saying a person's success is rooted in his community, and is not all his alone. Romney belittles this with his belief in individual initiative. He is better at the put-down than the push-up.
-
Romney shows little regard for common man
The Republicans in Congress have voted over and over, 33 times, redundantly and uselessly, to rescind what they call Obamacare.
-
Scouts' gay ban creates problem where none exists
The Boy Scouts of America's "emphatic reaffirmation" of its vow to exclude any and all homosexuals from its hallowed ranks is ill-considered and pathetic, especially in view of its having reviewed the matter for two years.
-
Schreibman tops Chris Gibson on women's issues
