My television is square, and my phone is stupid.
But I might not be any brighter than my phone, because I'm not one of the 100 million Americans who bought smartphones last year. (Yes, believe it or not, "smartphone" is now considered a word.) And apparently I'm not any cooler than my TV, because I have to look up what abbreviations such as LCD and LED mean when I see them in television ads. Somehow, I was able to figure out on my own what HD stood for.
Some years back, I wrote about my experience as a 5-year-old when my family got its first television. We stood back as if before a monolith as the screen filled with a snowy picture you could barely recognize. I often feel the same way today when visiting a home with one of those 48- or 60-inch wide-screens situated like an altar in a living room or large den, except that the images are crystal-clear.
My daughter and son-in-law were here in November, and he couldn't help suggesting that it might be time to upgrade from my square-screen 19-incher. Looking over the room, he said it would be perfect for a 30-some-inch wall-mounted flat-screen.
"But why?" I responded. "The one we have now works and it's only six years old. The last TV we had lasted 15 years." He shook his head, puzzled, and, walking away, said, "but it's obsolete." And that seems to be what's driving the electronic marketplace these days: Products are obsolete before their time. Many in my generation, and especially the previous one, tended to use things until they didn't work any more because the pace of technological progress was slower. Obviously, that's changed in the last decade or so with high-tech communications.
A smartphone that's a year old is already behind the rapid pace of advances in graphics, networks, platforms, apps and other attributes that only a user would be aware of. Most of those tens of millions of smartphone buyers last year already had one. They were just upgrading or changing platforms.
My phone, a basic, no-frills 2004 model, still rings when somebody calls me, still allows me to make a call and even shows me what time it is. The reason it's not "smart" is that it doesn't have Internet access or a keyboard, and it can't play songs or take and transmit photographs.
But I'm hesitant to call it names, such as a dumb-phone. And I refuse to be embarrassed when it rings with a Beatles tune in public and people see me with it. If they stare, I just say, "hey, it still works." Smartphones are even making personal-computer use obsolete for the younger generations because they just use their phones for texting, playing music and logging in to Facebook. The use of e-mail by people under age 50 has been declining the past two years by as much as 25 percent. There has been an increase in e-mail use only for the over-60 crowd.
Now, tablet-style computers such the iPad and other models soon to hit the market are going to make PCs a relic of the past. According to Forrester Research, an estimated 10.2 million U.S. adults are using tablets, with that number predicted to rise to 26.0 million this year, 50.7 million in 2012, and 82.1 million by 2015.
The technology, plug-ins and even wireless connections are now available to link PCs or tablets to newer televisions for downloading or streaming shows or movies on a large flat-screen. With all this innovation, how long can people like me hold out and keep our electronic products until they die? With e-book sales now surpassing purchases of the paper-and-cardboard variety, how much time will it take before we all have e-readers or tablets for our reading?
It definitely makes you wonder where it's all going, because there is no end in sight to the constant advances.
It's no wonder that most of the ads you see on television are for smartphones, cars, beer and pharmaceuticals. There must be some connection.
Sometimes, you feel akin to the people of a century ago who insisted they would never trade in their horses for cars, and the ones back in 1950 who were diehards about surrendering their radios in favor of televisions.
Maybe one of these days we'll figure out a way to integrate, and perhaps surpass, all our high-tech devices by planting a wireless chip in people that will permanently connect them to whatever "G" network surrounds the globe. Ultimately, people will be able to transmit or receive voices or thoughts at will.
Of course, then they'll really have to worry about who's listening in.
Cary Brunswick, of Oneonta, is a freelance writer and editor. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
My television is square, and my phone is stupid.
- Cary Brunswick
Book-banning has a tendency to backfire
So what does the 1960s game show ``What's My Line'' got to do with the Bloomsday festivities occurring in Dublin, Ireland, this week? Surprisingly, there is a link.
Envisioning a world without terror
We've become our own worst enemies
The past month has been marked by a seeming unprecedented number of man-made tragedies, as distinct from those caused by violent outbursts of the natural world, such as earthquakes, hurricanes and tsunamis.
Plenty of blame to go around for Bangladesh horror
After last week's act of ``corporate terrorism'' in Bangladesh, the irony is that worker advocates there are asking western consumers not to boycott the retailers or the clothing linked to the poor Asian nation's garment industry.
Obama is going against his word on Social Security
President Obama in his proposed budget posited cuts to Social Security cost-of-living increases as a way to get Republicans to go along with higher taxes on the wealthy. It's a strategy that's likely doomed to fail, and if it doesn't, it will tarnish his legacy as a Democratic president.
- Tuesday, April 2, 2013
Reflecting on a Florida trip
After spending two months in Florida, on the southwest coast, I have returned with a few major impressions of the region's wildlife, and some experiences that are entirely unique for me.
- Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Those magnificent spies in their flying machines
- Tuesday, March 5, 2013
2nd Amendment needs rewritten for 21st century
Over the years, I have written mostly about peace and the way our world leaders infringe upon it with war, personal freedom and the way our government tries to steal some away, and the environment, which is under constant assault by corporations.
- Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Cuomo, Obama aren't necessarily environmentalists
Gov. Andrew Cuomo and President Obama both are stalling on making major environmental decisions on energy development proposals. Meanwhile, the opposition is building as the climate-change issue gains momentum with each new statistic and extreme weather event.
- Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Like newspapers, obituaries have evolved
When I left The Daily Star a few years ago, I promised our news clerk that I would be sending along my obituary so she could keep it on file. That way, when the time came, all she would have to do is plug in the date.
- Tuesday, January 8, 2013
We get fooled again on FISA amendments
While everyone was busy teetering on the edge of the fiscal cliff 10 days ago, there was little fanfare or outrage when President Barack Obama signed a five-year extension of a Bush-era surveillance program.
- Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Fracking in N.Y. poses dilemma for Gov. Cuomo
Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who could be squaring off with Hillary Clinton for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016, is stuck between shale and a hard place on the question of whether to allow fracking in the state.
- Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Keep up-to-date on condition of fuel-oil tank
Former Oneonta residents Rob Kamerling and Cynthia Marsh Kamerling had a lot to be thankful for this past Thanksgiving -- family, friends, good health and a new community near Boulder, Colo.
- Tuesday, November 13, 2012
U.S. inches closer to edge of 'fiscal cliff'
I'm not sure who came up with the term "fiscal cliff," but it has been bouncing around for decades with one meaning or another. Now, with looming spending cuts and an end to tax cuts at the end of the year, the phrase has become a fearful household word.
- Tuesday, October 30, 2012
My two votes for McGovern weren't nearly enough
Back in the 1960s, a verse in a folk song by Barry McGuire proclaimed ``you're old enough to kill, but not for votin'.'' That's because the voting age was 21, while you could join or be drafted into the military at 18.
- Saturday, October 20, 2012
A 'democratic' system, but with caveats
- Saturday, September 29, 2012
Violence over film goes much deeper than blasphemy
- Saturday, September 8, 2012
Calling Ryan's words 'lies' is an understatement
It's no shock to learn that our presidents lie. Nixon did it. Clinton did it. And George W. Bush did it. What is shocking is that they are so easily forgiven, or that we so easily forget.
- Saturday, August 18, 2012
A few titles to help answer the deep questions
I have had a copy of Wittgenstein's "Philosophical Investigations" in my library for about 40 years now, and only one person has ever borrowed it.
- Saturday, July 28, 2012
Crying 'Marxist' alone is not a valid argument
It is strange that so many people like to throw around the "Marxist" label whenever someone advocates a little more planning for our economy or supports a more-inclusive and less-profit-making health-care system.
- Book-banning has a tendency to backfire